From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-05-28 18:02:30
Hartmut Kaiser skrev:
> I was waiting for Andy to fix two of the major complaints raised during the
> review (incompatible license in parts of the code and the generator
> initialization seed issue), because these would have prevented the
> acceptance into Boost. As Andy told me, he is almost done with the fixes. As
> soon as these are finished I'll have a look at the code and will announce
> the review results.
What has these to do woth the review results? I mean, normally a library
is accepted with a bunch of stuff that *must* be fixed before cvs upload.
I simply don't understand how the current work can affect the review
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk