From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-07 17:58:14
on Thu Jun 07 2007, "Robert Ramey" <ramey-AT-rrsd.com> wrote:
> Thomas Witt wrote:
>> Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>>>> * The inspection reports 193 non-license problems, and *1059*
>>>> license problems.
>>> Why can't these be fixed up for 1.34.1?
>> Because to many developers don't give a s... I tried to address this
>> early on in the 1.34 cycle. To no avail.
> Hmm - there's a little more to it. The inspection report flags
> all files without a license. In the case of the serialization library
> there are data files which contain test data to run some of the
Are they binary or text data? If the latter, I think a license is
appropriate. If binary, I think we need something we can mark up that
lists the binary files covered under the license.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk