Re: [boost] I'd like to write a static lambda library.

From: Alexander Nasonov (alnsn_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-06-27 06:59:51

Atry wrote:
> Alexander Nasonov wrote:
> Yes, getting a static function pointer is easy, I will add that method 
> later. But I have highly depended on typeof, I use typeof to determine 
> the result of almost all expressions, and Boost.Lambda does not. Typeof 
> enhanced lots of flexibility. For example, if a operator is overrided to 
> return a unusual return value, for Boost.Lambda, you have to manually 
> specify that return value using a "ret<return_type>(expr)" syntax. And I 
> used typeof to avoid that.

I agree that typeof is a very powerful tool but it's still non-standard.
Would it work if you enhance Boost.Lambda without using non-standard
extensions and then apply BOOST_TYPEOF in your _client_ code?

-- 
Alexander Nasonov
http://nasonov.blogspot.com
Error of opinion may be tolerated where reason is left free to
combat it. -- Thomas Jefferson --
This quote is generated by: 
	/usr/pkg/bin/curl -L http://tinyurl.com/veusy         \
	  | sed -e 's/^document\.write(.//' -e 's/.);$/ --/'  \
	        -e 's/<[^>]*>//g' -e 's/^More quotes from //' \
	  | fmt | tee ~/.signature-quote