Boost logo

Boost :

From: Hartmut Kaiser (hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-09-01 14:28:04


Larry Evans wrote:

> [snip]
> > No, that is not what we're talking about. LLVM can be used as a
> > back-end for GCC's C and C++ parsers, but that involves a
> lot of cruft from GCC.
> > Clang is a new, from-scratch, all-C++ parser that will be an
> > alternative LLVM front end for C and C++.
> Without this cruft, I assume you're very tempted to port your
> variadic template compiler to clang. Is that right?
>
> On another topic, I took a brief look at:
>
> http://llvm.org/cfe/docs/InternalsManual.html
>
> It maybe too late now, but I'd think boost's wave might have
> saved them some time in writing the preprocessor.

Definitely. But I checked and they did a decent job! Their preprocessor is
excellent, some stuff isn't implemented yet (i.e. UCNs), but what's there is
ok.

Regards Hartmut


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk