From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-10-02 22:01:42
on Sun Sep 30 2007, "Phil Endecott" <spam_from_boost_dev-AT-chezphil.org> wrote:
> Is "exception" the best choice of name for this library?
I think the functionality of this library may be too specific to be
given such a general name. There are several other things one might
want to do in a library called "exception," the only relationship
being that C++ exceptions are involved.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk