|
Boost : |
From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-10-14 17:34:39
Chris Fairles wrote:
> Hi David
>
> I just ran into this issue and it had been driving me nuts because the
> access violation only occured when compiled w/o optimizations mode
> (-O0 gcc 4.1.1) but WITH optimizations turned on, it magically works.
>
> The code that triggers the seg fault is line 391 of
> boost/system/error_code.hpp (operator<<):
> os << ec.category().name() << ':' << ec.value();
>
> I get the same behavior using .message() as well.
>
> It seems that, in debug mode, m_cat in the error_code has an address
> of 0x0 (well, the virtual pointer does). In release mode it has a
> valid address.
>
> Does this sound like it could be the order-of-init issue you are
> facing? Do you happen to have a solution? I'm not sure how to force
> order-of-initialization (or if the std even allows it).
Chris, are you using code from the Subversion trunk? That problem is
supposed to have been fixed some time ago.
--Beman
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk