|
Boost : |
From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-10-29 12:24:42
shunsuke skrev:
> Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
>> Single Pass Range:
>>
>> types:
>>
>> range_iterator<T>::type
>> range_iterator<const T>::type
>
> You mean range_mutable_iterator is no longer a public interface
> but a customization point?
yes.
> It seems a rational idea; "NVI" is always better.
nvi?
> range_iterator<remove_const<T>::type> might be cumbersome, though.
well, it shouldn't be neede that much.
> BTW, why not remove range_size<> from RandomAccessConcept,
> which is utterly useless, and even wrong around iterator range.
I'm all for removing it.
Why do you think it's wrong?
-Thorsten
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk