From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-11-08 11:57:02
David Abrahams wrote:
>> That means establishing a 1.36.0 milestone, declaring the criteria
>> for including a ticket in 1.35.0, telling people that if they want an
>> exception they have to get you to okay it, and maybe making any
>> assignments of tickets to 1.35.0 and 1.36.0 that are obvious. Then
>> we all have a list of issues to focus on killing off and we don't
>> need to pester people as much.
>> If you would like me to take on some of these tasks, please ask me.
> [dead silence since Monday]
> Am I really the only one that thinks this matters? I realize that as
> a project we don't have a lot of experience with effective use of bug
> and task tracking, but we also haven't been all that effective in the
> run-up to a release. Using the tools we have effectively can make a
> big difference.
Violent agreement from here.
We should also triage all the "Yet to be determined" bug reports as well, is
there a way to get a report of all the bugs Trac issues that haven't been at
least *looked at* yet?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk