From: Matias Capeletto (matias.capeletto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-11-22 00:19:13
On Nov 19, 2007 11:06 AM, Joaquín Mª López Muñoz <joaquin_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Line 97 of boost/bimap/relation/support/member_with_tag.hpp, which is
> the one where GCC 3.4.x stumbles upon, reads:
> template< class Relation >
> struct member_with_tag
> BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME member_at::info, Relation, void // line 97
> I think the problem is that BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME shouldn't be there as
> member_at::info does not depend on Relation. In fact, you've got other similar
> specializations at the same file all of which do not have BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME.
Thanks for spotting this Joaquin. I have removed it, lets see if this
affects the regressions.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk