From: Adam Badura (abadura_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-01-08 18:20:09
> There is extensive discussion of this issue in the archives. Try
> searching for "Boost.Xml"
I did some searching on the archive however found not that much. Yes.
Sure. There were few discussion however thay were mainly lists of wishes and
arguing which technology and methodology would be best. I did not found any
actual reaosn of the library not being in the boost still. It seems however
(after Stefan's post) that some work is done right now on this subject. Good
to hear (read) that.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk