From: John Torjo (john.groups_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-02-14 07:56:49
Jamie Allsop wrote:
> Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
>> Thanks to everyone participating in the review of proposed logging library.
>> I do believe this is one of the "must have" components to be included in
>> boost libraries suite. Anyone who is interrested in sharing views on the
>> subjust are still welcome (specifically I might be interrested in comparizon
>> with other popular existing solutions). Nevertheless official tally is
>> closed as of now and "jury is secluded for deliberations" ;). I'll try to
>> compile the results within reasonable time frame.
> There was earlier talk of extending the review period. I have still to
> submit my review but will not be able to do so until the weekend. Having
> gone to the effort of spending quite a few hours over the past week to
> try and use the logging library I'd like an opportunity to voice my
> opinion on it and have it taken into account.
Yes, I would agree. Also, Jurko Gospodnetic has said he'd do a review
later this week.
But it's all up to the review manager.
-- http://John.Torjo.com -- C++ expert http://blog.torjo.com ... call me only if you want things done right
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk