From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-02-14 10:20:06
John Torjo <john.groups <at> torjo.com> writes:
> Jamie Allsop wrote:
> > Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> Thanks to everyone participating in the review of proposed logging
> >> I do believe this is one of the "must have" components to be included in
> >> boost libraries suite. Anyone who is interrested in sharing views on the
> >> subjust are still welcome (specifically I might be interrested in
> >> with other popular existing solutions). Nevertheless official tally is
> >> closed as of now and "jury is secluded for deliberations" ;). I'll try to
> >> compile the results within reasonable time frame.
> > There was earlier talk of extending the review period. I have still to
> > submit my review but will not be able to do so until the weekend. Having
> > gone to the effort of spending quite a few hours over the past week to
> > try and use the logging library I'd like an opportunity to voice my
> > opinion on it and have it taken into account.
> Yes, I would agree. Also, Jurko Gospodnetic has said he'd do a review
> later this week.
> But it's all up to the review manager.
I explicitly asked for anyone interrested to extend the time to voice their
opinion. Beleive it or not I am not yet able to read your mind ;).
I'll confirm with Review wizard, But let's assume the extension is granted
till the end of the week.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk