Re: [boost] Switch namespace

From: Andrey Semashev (andysem_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-02-14 11:35:03

Steven Watanabe wrote:
> AMDG
> 
> Zach Laine wrote:
>>> How about:
>>>         boost::control_flow
>>>         boost::switch_case
>>> ?
>>>
>>> (I don't much like either of those, but maybe they'll inspire somebody
>>> else).
>>>     
>> Well, usually such compile-time versions of familair runtime
>> constructs are called static_*, so how about static_switch?
>>   
> 
> Well...  It's not really a compile time version of a switch statement.
> 
> Thanks for the help.  I think the best suggestions were control/control_flow
> although I'm still not entirely happy with them.

boost::functional?