From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-02-13 10:47:51
Zach Laine wrote:
>> How about:
>> (I don't much like either of those, but maybe they'll inspire somebody
> Well, usually such compile-time versions of familair runtime
> constructs are called static_*, so how about static_switch?
Well... It's not really a compile time version of a switch statement.
Thanks for the help. I think the best suggestions were control/control_flow
although I'm still not entirely happy with them.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk