From: Jeff Garland (jeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-02-22 09:22:55
John Maddock wrote:
> Daniel James wrote:
>> On 18/02/2008, Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> There is a seemingly endless set of improvements to *could* be made
>>> 1.35.0. But I think that it is time to try to identify any
>>> showstoppers, fix those, and defer everything else to the next
>> Are broken copyright links considered important enough for this
> Looks like this is all date-time library stuff?
> Given that this is a trivial search and replace to fix, and effects only
> comments not code, I'd say lets fix it, especially if you're willing to do
> the job ;-)
...sorry if this ends up being a duplicate...
Wow, is it really possible that this has been broken for 3 releases? Anyway,
instead of fixing the code why not just forward the -1.0.txt url to the
_1_0.txt on the web site? That's a 1 minute change and we can fix the code in
the next release.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk