From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-01 04:43:39
Anthony Williams wrote:
>> Couldn't this issue be handled by the boost config headers?
> That would seem better than handling it on a case-by-case basis, but
> it might change things for user code too (i.e. any code included
> *after* the boost headers).
It's also fragile: it only works if the Boost header is the first header
included, and if that header doesn't include any std lib headers before
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk