From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-08 13:29:21
Robert Ramey wrote:
> It looks to me that using BOOST_NO_ADL_BARRIER will properly address
> situation I have with boost/serialization/shared_ptr132.
> Shouldn't BOOST_NO_ADL_BARRIER be also defined for borland compilers
> and perhaps others?
I've no idea: does it fail the tests? If so then yes for sure :-)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk