Re: [boost] question regarding the new BOOST_NO_ADL_BARRIER

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-08 13:29:21

Robert Ramey wrote:
> It looks to me that using BOOST_NO_ADL_BARRIER will properly address
> situation I have with boost/serialization/shared_ptr132.
> 
> Shouldn't BOOST_NO_ADL_BARRIER be also defined for borland compilers
> 5.6x 
> and perhaps others?

I've no idea: does it fail the tests?  If so then yes for sure :-)

John.