Re: [boost] question regarding the new BOOST_NO_ADL_BARRIER

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-08 13:48:49

John Maddock wrote:
> Robert Ramey wrote:
>> It looks to me that using BOOST_NO_ADL_BARRIER will properly address
>> situation I have with boost/serialization/shared_ptr132.
>>
>> Shouldn't BOOST_NO_ADL_BARRIER be also defined for borland compilers
>> 5.6x
>> and perhaps others?
>
> I've no idea: does it fail the tests?  If so then yes for sure :-)

Hmmm, seems the current tests pass with Borland (5.6.4 and 5.8.2), do you 
have a test case for the problem you're working around so we can see if it's 
the same issue?

Thanks, John.