From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-08 15:58:12
I've got a problem with Trak Ticket #1285 which I believe
will resolve for VC 9 and I was wondering if would be used to eliminate the
hack for borland that's in there
John Maddock wrote:
> John Maddock wrote:
>> Robert Ramey wrote:
>>> It looks to me that using BOOST_NO_ADL_BARRIER will properly address
>>> situation I have with boost/serialization/shared_ptr132.
>>> Shouldn't BOOST_NO_ADL_BARRIER be also defined for borland compilers
>>> and perhaps others?
>> I've no idea: does it fail the tests? If so then yes for sure :-)
> Hmmm, seems the current tests pass with Borland (5.6.4 and 5.8.2), do
> you have a test case for the problem you're working around so we can
> see if it's the same issue?
> Thanks, John.
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk