Re: [boost] [announce] Multi signature boost::function

From: Joseph Wu (josephclwu_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-04-26 06:37:03

Marco Costalba wrote:

> If there is interest I can improve documentation and examples.

I am definitely interested. I think it should be submitted for review.

Some comments:

1. Does "reset" sound like a better name for "unset"?

2. How about providing a get<signature> method returning ref to the
underlying boost::function object.
        - this facilitates interfacing with other API already using
boost::function.
        - f.get<signature>() = 0; may be used instead of "unset".

Regards, Joseph