From: John Femiani (JOHN.FEMIANI_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-21 13:54:20
> Would the term "pruned_leaf" be an acceptable compromise?
> The "pruned_" prefix would imply the "context" you mentioned
> above as well as "subset of them" [where them is nodes]
> mengioned above. In the case that the node was an actual
> leaf (e.g. an actual file) then the "size of the pruning"
> would be just 0, where "size of pruning" is the distance to
> an actual leaf (where actual leaf means the same as leaf node
> in this quote:
How about deprecating branch_path and using 'head', and deprecating
'leaf' in favor of 'tail'? This replaces tree terms with list terms,
since a path is a list.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk