Re: [boost] Updated version of futures library

From: Hartmut Kaiser (hartmut.kaiser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-30 16:56:59

> > This reminds me of a discussion we had some time ago, namely
> overloading
> > operator&&() for futures allowing to achieve the same thing: waiting
> for all
> > of the futures:
> 
> Yes. I was trying to stay away from the overloaded operators, but this
> is certainly the same issue.

Are you interested in something like this? 
What's your reason for 'staying away' from the operators so far?

Regards Hartmut