From: Rene Rivera (grafikrobot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-06-28 10:46:34
John Maddock wrote:
> Rene Rivera wrote:
>>> The problem is that the Jamfile for the math lib is doing a compile
>>> test. That seems like a bad idea to me if there's no purpose other
>>> to just do the test.
>>> So, is there a good reason for doing that test during build?
> One of the three libraries built in that Jamfile won't build on Darwin
> (because of no long double support for that platform in Boost.Math), the
> test is there to suppress building of that library in that case -
> without it you'll get thousands of pages of meaningless compiler errors
> which won't be much use to the user :-(
> Any better suggestions? BTW I basically copied the code from what the
> serialisation library does when there's no wchar_t support.
Hm, I'll have to think some more about that.
>>> PS. It makes it a PITA to test building Boost before merging to
>>> with such things going on!
> How so? Not trying to awkward... just to understand the issues,
Initially just because I didn't know if it was a problem I introduced,
since I was working on making build changes. Hence I spent a good number
of minutes trying to figure out the ultimate programmer question "Did
*I* break something?". It means that each time I do the top level build
I'll have to take careful note if it's the failing test or something I
did. And as you know humans aren't very good at doing careful repetitive
tasks. So it's a PITA since it means more time I have to spend thinking
about the output, and less about what I'm trying to fix.
-- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org (msn) - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim,yahoo,skype,efnet,gmail
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk