From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-07-10 20:04:48
Jeremy Pack <rostovpack <at> gmail.com> writes:
> The revision causing the fault is probably 46159. 46158 does not have the
> >From the looks of the CL, the revised version is more correct - but I'm
> guessing it opens up some error that was hidden before.
This is Volodia's fix for valgrind warning (see
Can you try an alternative proposed the same thread and let me know if it works?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk