Boost logo

Boost :

From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-07-18 11:41:31

David Abrahams <dave <at>> writes:

> on Fri Jul 18 2008, "Leo Moisio" <> wrote:
> > The documentation for Boost.Test on seems very outdated,
> I find that situation to be almost intolerable. I realize not everyone
> will agree with me, but IMO if a library's documentation cannot be kept
> up to date, the changes to the library code (and maybe the library
> itself) don't belong in Boost.

The situation is indeed dare. I gave a shot couple time to syncing docs, but it
seems to require even more efforts. The biggest hurdle for me is that it doesn't
seem like anyone support Boostbook. At least my question/change suggestion were
never answered. And I do need to make changes to be able to check in my code.
Making changes to BoostBook is not a simple task and required a significant
investment of time and efforts for me.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at