From: Douglas Gregor (dgregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-07-22 10:48:51
On Jul 18, 2008, at 11:41 AM, Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
> David Abrahams <dave <at> boostpro.com> writes:
>> on Fri Jul 18 2008, "Leo Moisio" <leo.moisio-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
>>> The documentation for Boost.Test on boost.org seems very outdated,
>> I find that situation to be almost intolerable. I realize not
>> will agree with me, but IMO if a library's documentation cannot be
>> up to date, the changes to the library code (and maybe the library
>> itself) don't belong in Boost.
> The situation is indeed dare. I gave a shot couple time to syncing
> docs, but it
> seems to require even more efforts. The biggest hurdle for me is
> that it doesn't
> seem like anyone support Boostbook. At least my question/change
> suggestion were
> never answered. And I do need to make changes to be able to check
> in my code.
> Making changes to BoostBook is not a simple task and required a
> investment of time and efforts for me.
In looking through the boost-docs list, and I don't see any
unanswered questions from you. BoostBook is working fine for quite a
few libraries; what problems are you still running into?