From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-08-27 19:37:41
on Wed Aug 27 2008, "Emil Dotchevski" <emil-AT-revergestudios.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:27 PM, David Abrahams
>> So IIUC, your intention was never to require RTTI in throw_exception,
>> and Emil didn't know that, so he violated your original intent
> No, the problem is that essentially we have a bug that was
> undiscovered until users pointed it out.
> My intention was to disable the integration of Boost Exception in
> boost::throw_exception if RTTI is not available. My wrong
> understanding was that using BOOST_NO_TYPEID accomplishes that, but it
Ah, thanks for clarifying that.
> Now we have BOOST_NO_RTTI. I will plug that in some time this week; I
> thought that this change isn't urgent because we are not making point
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk