Subject: Re: [boost] lifetime of ranges vs. iterators
From: Arno SchÃ¶dl (aschoedl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-09-03 13:19:55
> > I'm not there yet, but I know enough about the problem now that I
> > wouldn't "buy" a partial solution.
> Before I start playing around with the problem, is my throwing increment_and_dereference optimization fair game? I believe I can't > do without.
Since dereference does not need to end-check, throwing increment() is probably the basic building block. Fair game?
-- Dr. Arno Schoedl Â· aschoedl_at_[hidden] Technical Director think-cell Software GmbH Â· Invalidenstr. 34 Â· 10115 Berlin, Germany http://www.think-cell.com Â· phone +49-30-666473-10 Â· toll-free (US) +1-800-891-8091 Directors: Dr. Markus Hannebauer, Dr. Arno Schoedl Â· Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 85229
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk