Re: [boost] lifetime of ranges vs. iterators

Subject: Re: [boost] lifetime of ranges vs. iterators
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-09-03 13:24:11

on Wed Sep 03 2008, Arno Schödl <aschoedl-AT-think-cell.com> wrote:

>> > I'm not there yet, but I know enough about the problem now that I
>> > wouldn't "buy" a partial solution.
>
>> Before I start playing around with the problem, is my throwing
> increment_and_dereference optimization fair game? I believe I can't > do
> without.
>
> Since dereference does not need to end-check, throwing increment() is
> probably the basic building block. Fair game?

Sorry, I really don't know what you're asking.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com