Subject: Re: [boost] svn:eol-style issues (Was: Re: [quickbook] probs with docu generation (C++ code))
From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-29 17:23:46
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Daniel James <daniel_james_at_[hidden]>wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:27:20AM +0000, Daniel James wrote:
> >> Probably. This should be fixed in trunk and the new release.
> Just to be clear, the following isn't really related to the quickbook
> bug that I fixed.
> 2008/10/27 Jens Seidel <jensseidel_at_[hidden]>:
> > I checked the release branch for missing or bogus svn:eol-style
> > and found a few. I was very surprised not to find hundreds or even more
> > such files.
> > Here is a list. I also attached the output of svn diff but you probably
> > cannot apply a patch on properties. Please check and commit:
> Thanks for checking this, I think that most of the files you indicated
> were fixed in trunk four months (revision 46445) but it was never
> merged. Beman, is it okay to merge this? It's not vital, but it
> shouldn't break anything. Although, I'm a little weary about changing
> Jamfiles, as they seem to be to sensitive to line endings. I think the
> only case which is important are the shell scripts, which must have
> unix line-endings.
Hum... I'm a little concerned about changing at this point. I'm leaning
toward waiting until after the release, at least for the Jamfiles.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk