Re: [boost] [signals2] extended_slot_type bug with preferred syntax

Subject: Re: [boost] [signals2] extended_slot_type bug with preferred syntax
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-12 05:32:17

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Frank Mori Hess" <frank.hess_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 5:45 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] [signals2] extended_slot_type bug with preferred syntax

>> I've looked at the documentation for the word 'thread' and I've found it
>> only three times. I think the normal user wants to know more detailed
>> informations about the thread safe signals library at a thread context. 
>> Do
>> you also plan to enrich the documentation here?
>
> Hmm, yes I think adding a section on thread-safety to the design overview
> would help a lot.

Could you scketch how do you plan to do this section if the libarry is 
accepted before the review manager gives the result of the review?

Thanks,
Vicente