Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Is Boost.Range broken?
From: Daniel Walker (daniel.j.walker_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-23 12:42:36

On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 1:55 AM, David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> on Sat Nov 22 2008, "Daniel Walker" <> wrote:
>> As far as I can tell from looking at the svn history,
>> when iterator_range failed to meet the Range concepts, rather than
>> changing iterator_range, the concept checks were gutted. If you don't
>> pass the test, change the test?!!! :(
> Let's not get ahead of ourselves. That's exactly the right thing to do
> when the test is wrong. The question is, was it? That depends on the
> documentation. Did the test match the specification before and/or after
> this modification? Or, was the specification modified too?

I don't mean to overreact. However, the specification was modified
too. The Range concept was defined in the review, and I see no reason
that it should have changed.

Daniel Walker

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at