Re: [boost] [interprocess] default constructors

Subject: Re: [boost] [interprocess] default constructors
From: Giovanni Piero Deretta (gpderetta_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-30 06:35:43

On 11/30/08, Ion Gaztañaga <igaztanaga_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Jan Stetka wrote:
>
> > I'm don't known what "move semantics" are, my motive is so I can have
> named_mutex and managed_shared_memory in the global scope without having to
> instantiate as pointers.
> >
>
>  In other words, you want to create a default-constructed type and then swap
> it with a named constructed one when you have enough data to build a named
> object?

IMHO for this purpose  boost.optional + inplace factory is the best solution.

-- 
gpd