Subject: Re: [boost] [python] Python 3.0
From: Robert Dailey (rcdailey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-12-05 11:21:44
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Stefan Seefeld <seefeld_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Robert Dailey wrote:
>> Thanks for your response. I thought about trying it but I'm just too busy
>> work unfortunately. Does anyone on the boost team plan on upgrading
>> Boost.Python to work with Python 3.0 since it was finally released on
>> December 3rd?
> I just tried building against python 3, and, as expected, ran into a couple
> of compilation errors. I have no idea (yet) how big the changes between the
> Python 2.x C API and the Python 3 C API are, and thus, how much effort is
> required to add support for Python 3.
> However, given how much backward incompatibe changes went into Python 3, I
> expect Python 2(.6) to stay around for quite a long time, so adding support
> for Python 3 to boost.python may not be a very pressing issue.
> But that's just my 2 cents, obviously.
I personally find Python 3.0 to be far more intuitive syntactically as a
language. Things are more consistent and I am totally in love with the new
features. I really would love to see Boost.Python add support in the near
future! Thanks for expressing your opinions on the matter Stefan.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk