Re: [boost] [logging] Interest check on logging library.

Subject: Re: [boost] [logging] Interest check on logging library.
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-01 15:57:02

on Thu Jan 01 2009, Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev-AT-gmail.com> wrote:

> Jamie Allsop wrote:
>>
>> If I recall your library requires a lib to be linked in. That's a deal breaker for
>> me.
>
> That is true, the library has to be compiled. If it is to support multi-module
> configuration with centralized logging control, I don't see how it could be done the
> other way.

It's possible to build libraries so they can support both
separately-compiled and header-only (possibly with reduced
functionality) models.  You can find threads about that in the message
history for this list.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com