Subject: Re: [boost] [accumulators] rolling mean
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-03 11:45:27
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Niebler" <eric_at_[hidden]>
To: "Boost mailing list" <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2008 7:59 PM
Subject: [boost] [accumulators] rolling mean
> The accumulators library now has a handful of rolling accumulators,
> including a rolling sum and a rolling mean. These have been on trunk for
> about a week, and have recently been merged to release and will be part
> of the 1.38 release.
this is a very good new. I have suggested something like that on this ML but without any response
Sorry for my english if sliding is not the adequated name for the rolling functionality. I've take a look and I see the window is given at run-time. Do you think that a static implementation could improve the performances?
What do you think about the dependent accumulators (see my post)?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk