Subject: Re: [boost] [spirit] Library naming and sub-libraries
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-03 13:53:49
Thomas Klimpel wrote:
> Andrey Semashev wrote:
>> Why Boost.Parsing or Boost.Generating are bad?
> I guess because they raise the question where the grammar lives.
Are Boost.Grammar.Parsing and Boost.Grammar.Generating better in this
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk