Subject: Re: [boost] Vault: still needed?
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-23 12:38:46
on Fri Jan 23 2009, Henrik Sundberg <storangen-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Markus Werle
> <numerical.simulation_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> I checkout the sandbox for a given date
>> et voila: I find the submitted tar.gz or zip file of the
>> original proposal and can compare the discussion against
>> this package.
>> There is an other advantage, too: Since SVN has binary diff
>> storage, the disk usage is lower than in a simple file repo.
>> I really recommend to hold *any* file under SVN.
>> Also I like the many extra possibilities like e.g. WebDAV access
>> (davfs2, etc. )
> Both for the diffing purpose and for repo size (a small change in a
> zip, can change the archive a lot, invalidating the smartness of svn
> binary diff), I think zips should be avoided (forbidden?) in the
Maybe, but that sort of invalidates one of the useful things about the
vault. Maybe it'd be better to use trac wiki attachments for .zip
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk