Subject: Re: [boost] [1.38.0] beta 2 release candidate
From: Michael Fawcett (michael.fawcett_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-29 16:42:20
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 4:34 PM, vicente.botet <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Well, I think that this has been discused already. A lot of people prefer the fonctianalities provided by this page http://beta.boost.org/doc/libs/ compared to 'libs/libraries.htm' in the distribution because it is a superset. I don't kwno which technology use this page. Is there a technical issue to dont include this kind of pages on the distribution?
Not that it matters this late in the game (or at all?), but I prefer
the former page.
The libs/libraries.htm page really has some usability issues. Having
all of the Summaries, Author, Release Date, etc always visible makes
scrolling through the list extremely tedious. Not to mention the fact
that the Alphabetical option doesn't even sort correctly.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk