Subject: Re: [boost] [accumulators] why not operator+=?
From: Neal Becker (ndbecker2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-30 15:07:10
Eric Niebler wrote:
> Neal Becker wrote:
>> A nit perhaps, but why not overload += to process samples?
> Would that be horribly misleading if the accumulator set isn't actually
> doing addition? I'm happy with the function-style interface.
Not sure what you mean by addition. Here, we are 'adding' a new sample (or
samples) to the collection of samples. It doesn't matter whether the
underlying accumulator then uses 'addition' or not. Seems clear to me.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk