Re: [boost] [New Feature Suggestion] Fast RTTI Implementation

Subject: Re: [boost] [New Feature Suggestion] Fast RTTI Implementation
From: James Porter (porterj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-02-06 18:28:00

류인환 wrote:
> Hello there.
> Let me introduce the fast rtti system.
> Many other library and system(ex. game engines) has there own rtti system.
> But normally their rtti system consume Big O(n) for dynamic casting another
> type.
> So, I implemented fast rtti Big O(1) time consuming rtti system.
> I used bit signature for class inhertance hierarchy expression.
> Thanks for reviewing my mail and source code

How does the performance compare to compiler-native implementations of RTTI?

- Jim