Subject: Re: [boost] Formal Review Request: Boost.String.Convert
From: Stewart, Robert (Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-02-17 15:32:37
On Tuesday, February 17, 2009 3:11 PM
Scott McMurray wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 14:55, Stewart, Robert
> <Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > The arguments, whether function or template, would specify
> the conversion to apply. For example, to_string<int>(s)
> could also be written as convert<int>(s). (Both can be
> rearranged to take two arguments and return a bool, for
> example, so the point is merely to eliminate directionality
> and "string" from the name.)
> Why is removing directionality from the name a good idea?
With just one name to remember -- the arguments can supply the rest -- the interface is simpler.
Rob Stewart robert.stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer, Core Software using std::disclaimer;
Susquehanna International Group, LLP http://www.sig.com
IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk