Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [C++0x] The cpp0x branch has been merged into trunk
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-03-12 10:56:58

Beman Dawes wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Bo Persson <bop_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Andrey Semashev wrote:
>>> Beman Dawes wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Andrey Semashev
>>>> <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>>> Is there a macro that shows if the "auto" keyword has C++0x
>>>>> meaning?
>>>> Not yet. Care to submit one?
>>> Any suggestions for the naming? BOOST_NO_AUTO_DECLARATIONS?
>>>> Do any compilers support 0x auto? GCC 4.4 is supposed to support 0x
>>>> auto (at least partially), but won't ship until summer IIRC.
>>> Yes, I'm too aware only of GCC 4.4, but it's a sufficient precedent.
>> VS2010 is another one, with a ship date later than this summer but
>> reasonably before 2010.
> Ah! I'd forgotten VS2010 has C++0x auto support.

The macros went into trunk at revision 51733. I also enabled several 0x
features for VS2010, as the configuration tests seem to pass on CTP version.

One thing I'm not sure about is whether these features are supported for
Codegear or Borland. It seems to include some 0x features, so I left
these macros undefined for them. I'll see if the tests fail on these
compilers and define the macros if needed.

BTW: What's the difference between codegear.hpp and borland.hpp? Isn't
it the same compiler?

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at