Subject: Re: [boost] [serialization] BOOST_NO_EXCEPTIONS bug
From: Vladimir Prus (vladimir_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-04-14 14:29:17
Robert Ramey wrote:
> First of all, I should say I'm really embarassed to find such an
> idiotic oversight on my part.
> I've got no problem in seeing this checked into the trunk.
> However, I don't think checking in a change directly into the
> release branch is a great idea. This file is included by anything
> in the library that throws an exception. Without comprehensive
> testing, it's impossible to know that there will be no unexpected
> repercussions. These repercussions could hold up the release
> of ALL libraries for 1.39.
I don't think this is likely -- given that no tests are run with
BOOST_NO_EXCEPTIONS defined, so even if some compilers, upon
seeing the "inline" keyword, immediately die, this won't cause
regression tests on release branch to die.
> On the other hand, we know the repercussions
> of letting this slide to the next release. One (very important) user
> will have to patch his local copy until the next release.
> I think the best is to check it into the trunk and let it
> migrate into the release using the normal procedure.
You mean, after seeing that nothing breaks? The release branch is open
until 20th, so we have the time. Should I commit to trunk?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk