Subject: Re: [boost] inline specifier within in class definition
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-05-04 07:24:05
Milosz Marian HULBOJ wrote:
> Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>> Could anyone explain why some static member functions defined
>> within class definitions are specified with inline keyword? ...
> Hi, Check out the following discussion: "Is there a special reason to
> use inline before template functions?"
However, I've not found clear answer in that thread.
Looks like it's a kind of mix of historical relict of old
pre-standard habits with disbelief today compilers are able
-- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk