|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] inline specifier within in class definition
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-05-04 07:24:05
Milosz Marian HULBOJ wrote:
> Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Could anyone explain why some static member functions defined
>> within class definitions are specified with inline keyword? ...
>
> Hi, Check out the following discussion: "Is there a special reason to
> use inline before template functions?"
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.ublas/4638
Thanks Milosz.
However, I've not found clear answer in that thread.
Looks like it's a kind of mix of historical relict of old
pre-standard habits with disbelief today compilers are able
choose right
Best regards,
-- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk