Subject: Re: [boost] inline specifier within in class definition
From: Milosz Marian HULBOJ (mhulboj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-05-04 05:22:39
Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> Could anyone explain why some static member functions defined within
> class definitions are specified with inline keyword?
Check out the following discussion:
"Is there a special reason to use inline before template functions?"
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk