Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] inline specifier within in class definition
From: Milosz Marian HULBOJ (mhulboj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-05-04 05:22:39

Next message: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [boost] [1.40.0] OK to build release?"
Previous message: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [boost] [1.40.0] OK to build release?"
In reply to: Mateusz Loskot: "[boost] inline specifier within in class definition"
Next in thread: Mateusz Loskot: "Re: [boost] inline specifier within in class definition"
Reply: Mateusz Loskot: "Re: [boost] inline specifier within in class definition"

Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could anyone explain why some static member functions defined within
> class definitions are specified with inline keyword?
> ...

Hi,
Check out the following discussion:
"Is there a special reason to use inline before template functions?"
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.ublas/4638

Cheers,
Milosz

Next message: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [boost] [1.40.0] OK to build release?"
Previous message: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [boost] [1.40.0] OK to build release?"
In reply to: Mateusz Loskot: "[boost] inline specifier within in class definition"
Next in thread: Mateusz Loskot: "Re: [boost] inline specifier within in class definition"
Reply: Mateusz Loskot: "Re: [boost] inline specifier within in class definition"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk