Subject: Re: [boost] trunk vs release
From: Daniel James (daniel_james_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-05-21 10:51:48
2009/5/21 troy d. straszheim <troy_at_[hidden]>:
> Okay, but with the current trunk, you're regression testing a lot of cruft
> that has been sitting there ignored for years.
Whatever branching scheme you use, unmaintained code will still be unmaintained.
> How about regression-testing
> a codebase that has a fighting chance of actually becoming a release?
Boost is a volunteer organisation. In order for something to happen
that effects everyone, someone has to make a proposal, convince people
(I'm not sure exactly who) to go along with it, deal with whatever
issues there are and put it into action. And in this case, nobody has.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk