Subject: Re: [boost] mingw help
From: Vladimir Prus (vladimir_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-05-30 12:46:51
>> 1. Currently, we use the same naming on mingw as on windows
>> foo.dll and foo.lib for shared libs and import libs, and
>> for static library. Is this OK?
> No, this is definatly not correct.
> This is how, autotools generate libraries:
> Mingw Naming convention for library "foo" with ABI version 3:
> Static library: libfoo.a --> installed to lib
> Import lubrary: libfoo.dll.a --> installed to lib
> Dynamic library: libfoo-3.dll --> installed to bin
And what is wrong, specifically, with the convention I've outlined above? Also,
what is 'lib' and 'bin'? mingw compiler is perfectly useable without any
'minsys' thing, right?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk