Subject: Re: [boost] boost::directx?
From: Christian Schladetsch (christian.schladetsch_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-06-07 10:14:46
> Are the other wrappers good enough from C++ (or boost, for that matter)
> point of view? If not, then it might be worthy to make an improvement in
> that area. That was my point. YMMV
DirectX doesn't need to be "wrapped", other than maybe using com_ptr<T>.
That is not my point.
My point is that there are structures and techniques that are general and
useful for DirectX coders. These things should be in a common namespace.
Denying this reality does nothing but remove boost from reality.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk