Subject: Re: [boost] boost::directx?
From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-06-11 08:40:03
Joseph Gauterin skrev:
> I agree with you that a library supporting DirectX in C++ would be
> very useful, but I also agree that such a library wouldn't be
> appropriate for boost, as it wouldn't be portable at all.
I don't see that as a good reason for not having it in boost.
We have libraries that are tied to third parti libs, and we have
libraries with a very narrow use, far fewer people using them that
would a DirectX library IMO.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk